IoT Analytics, a leading global provider of market insights and strategic business intelligence for the Internet of Things (IoT), AI, Cloud, Edge and Industry 4.0, released the Cloud Computing for IoT Market Report 2021-2026 on the current state and trends of the IoT Cloud Computing Market.
This article focuses on the comparison of the three leading global hyperscalers (Microsoft Azure, AWS and Google Cloud) and their portfolio of IoT cloud-specific services.
Key insights:
- The three large hyperscalers collectively hold ~80% of the global IoT public cloud market.
- IoT is of high strategic importance to both Microsoft and AWS, while Google does not prioritize it as much.
Key quotes:
- Knud Lasse Lueth, CEO at IoT Analytics:
“Although offering public cloud services for connecting IoT devices is not (yet) a major driver for the businesses of the three major hyperscalers, IoT services and related cloud infrastructure investments are expected to grow faster than general public cloud spending and will thus increase in strategic importance during the coming years as public cloud becomes a multi-trillion-dollar market.”
- Mohammad Hasan, Analyst at IoT Analytics adds: “AWS offers the largest portfolio of IoT cloud services and their expansion continues, with the introduction of more industry-specific offerings as observed at re:Invent 2021. Azure continues to reign with its enterprise stronghold. Google’s focus on IoT to this date has not matched that of its major competitors.”
THE IOT CLOUD: MICROSOFT AZURE VS. AWS VS. GOOGLE CLOUD
The three leading global hyperscalers (AWS, Microsoft, and Google Cloud) hold more than 80% market share for global public cloud services specifically for IoT workloads according to the latest research from IoT Analytics: Cloud Computing for IoT Market Report 2021–2026, a 135-page report on the current state and trends of the IoT cloud
computing market.
Although offering public cloud services for connecting IoT devices is not (yet) a major driver for the businesses of these companies, IoT services and related cloud infrastructure investments are expected to grow faster than general public cloud spending and will thus increase in strategic importance during the coming years as public cloud becomes a multi-trillion-dollar market.
AWS had the first-mover advantage, introducing public cloud services in 2006 and adding IoT-specific services in 2015. Microsoft Azure, which launched its public cloud four years after AWS, introduced its IoT services only five months after AWS and has since managed to overtake AWS as the market leader for IoT-specific services thanks to its IoT-centric strategy, a $5 billion investment in IoT in 2018, and its strong business footprint in the enterprise segment, which accounts for some of the biggest IoT deployments. GCP has managed to keep its position as a strong challenger to Azure and AWS due to its stronghold in data and analytics. However, Google’s focus on IoT to this date has not matched that of its major competitors.
TYPICAL IOT CLOUD SERVICES
Managing billions of IoT devices requires a set of dedicated cloud services. IoT Analytics classifies IoT cloud offerings into three main categories (the same way we classify IoT platform services, with the exception that IoT platform services can also reside in a private cloud or on other on-premises installations):
1. IoT application management/enablement
These include cloud services designed to enable the developer to make and manage IoT applications. IoT-specific application development and management services include rule engines, IoT development environments, and digital twins.
2. IoT device management
These include cloud services designed to ensure connected “things” are working properly by seamlessly running patches and updates for software and applications running on the device or edge gateways. Examples include device monitoring, firmware updates, or deployment configuration management.
3. IoT data management/enablement
These cloud services are designed for seamless asset/edge connectivity (e.g., drivers to connect devices) and for providing the capabilities to store and analyze IoT data.
COMPARING THE THREE MAIN IOT CLOUDS
1. Microsoft Azure IoT
Of the three major hyperscalers, Microsoft has the strongest enterprise customer base due to the wide adoption of Microsoft Windows, Microsoft 365 (formerly Office 365), and Microsoft Dynamics. For many customers, it has been easy to add new Microsoft Azure cloud services on top of already existing tools. Key differentiators for Microsoft Azure, in general, are its integration with business intelligence tools (particularly Power BI), its industry-specific solutions (e.g., Microsoft Cloud for Retail or Microsoft Cloud for Manufacturing), and the company’s strong focus on enterprise support.
Microsoft lists nine specific IoT cloud services on its websites. IoT Hub is the most widely used Azure IoT service, based on an analysis of the 167 publicly available IoT case studies by Microsoft Azure, followed by Azure IoT Edge. Azure IoT Hub is Microsoft’s core service for data ingestion into the cloud from IoT devices. The service provides secure communication to IoT devices and device management capabilities, such as device provisioning.
For Microsoft, IoT is a key priority. The company emphasizes that it aims to simplify the way IoT is used by enterprises and industries to achieve better interoperability and cohesion with other services in the IoT value chain. Microsoft has a specific focus on Industrial IoT and edge computing (e.g., through Azure Sphere certified chips and operating systems or through its Azure Percept edge AI platform).
“From smart factories to smart buildings to smart cities, we are helping organizations use the combination of Azure IoT, Digital Twins, and Mesh to help digitize people, places, and things, in order to visualize, simulate, and analyze any business process. Ecolab, for example, is using these tools to build its own platform to model and optimize water management. …And so today, between Azure IoT, Digital Twins, and Mesh, we have many examples where customers are engaged with us. So that’s what will show up in Azure, and we’re investing significantly there.” – Satya Nadella, CEO of Microsoft, 25 January 2022
Azure IoT in action
To understand how all the different Microsoft IoT components come together, consider the following reference architecture for condition monitoring for industrial IoT.
The picture demonstrates how manufacturers can connect their assets to the Microsoft Cloud using the Open Platform Communications Unified Architecture (OPC UA) protocol. Data are sent to edge devices that are running Azure IoT Edge. Industrial devices that cannot communicate through OPC UA need a third-party PLC adapter to connect to IoT Edge. Data are then sent on to IoT Hub, which ingests the data into the cloud and passes them on to industrial services hosted on Kubernetes container management. The industrial services are made up of several microservices exposing a REST API. All industrial services are deployed to an Azure Kubernetes Service cluster. Azure Event Hub is used to transform and distribute the data to other services, such as Azure IoT Time Series Insights, Data Storage, and Stream Analytics. With this architecture, customers can monitor their equipment’s key parameters to discover anomalies before they become critical issues.
Kennametal, a US-based supplier of industrial materials, is a known Microsoft IoT customer reference in this area. The company’s Orwell factory leverages IoT and Microsoft cloud solutions to monitor and optimize the performance of its manufacturing operations.
Azure’s IoT-specific services
Microsoft lists eight specific IoT cloud services on its IoT products page. (Note: Some IoT services are missing on this
page.)
- Application management/enablement: Azure IoT Central, Azure Digital Twins
- Device management: Azure IoT Hub
- Data management/enablement: Azure IoT Edge
- Other IoT offerings: Azure Percept, Azure Sphere, Windows for IoT, Azure RTOS
2. AWS IoT
AWS is the global public cloud market leader and was first to market with IoT-specific public cloud solutions. Its biggest strength is its sheer mass of specific public cloud services (the company lists a total of 227 different cloud services on its website as of February 2022) and the related customer footprint and developer ecosystem.
Customers are often delighted with the ease of learning and setup, the usability of the offerings, and the helpful tutorials offered by the company. AWS is also seen as a leader in serverless computing with offerings such as Lambda and Athena.
Our findings show that IoT Core is the most popular AWS IoT service (based on public IoT case studies).
IoT Core for AWS is somewhat equivalent to IoT Hub for Microsoft. IoT Core is a data ingestion service that provides secure, bi-directional communication for IoT devices, using protocols such as MQTT or HTTPS. While Microsoft includes its device management capabilities as standard in its IoT Hub, an AWS customer has the flexibility to use IoT Core without some of the device management capabilities or add the AWS IoT Device Management service on top if needed. This is where the IoT strategies of AWS and Microsoft differ: AWS provides more services in total, but
some of them have specialized features.
Therefore, it is not surprising that AWS has the largest portfolio of IoT-focused cloud services, with 13 offerings. And the company continues to add new services. At the December 2021 re: Invent conference, two new IoT services were launched: AWS IoT TwinMaker and AWS IoT FleetWise. The company also announced three other services with IoT relevance: AWS IoT RoboRunner, a specific service for robotics, AWS IoT ExpressLink, a connectivity software that powers a range of hardware modules developed and offered by AWS Partners, and AWS Private 5G, a managed service that makes it easy to deploy, operate, and scale a private cellular network, with all required hardware and software provided by AWS. This could act as a catalyst for AWS’ industrial IoT and edge offerings.
The new CEO, Adam Selipsky’s, approach to tapping the cloud market differs from that of his predecessor, Andy Jassy. Selipsky’s strategy involves expanding AWS’ offerings beyond general-purpose cloud technologies into industry- and use-case-specific services. IoT is a key area of focus, as can be ascertained from the recent series of IoT-specific releases and his statements.
“We are going to work aggressively on ‘internet of things’ solutions, on ML solutions and these horizontal use cases and applications as well as bundle it together in ways that are attractive to solving customer problems.”
Adam Selipsky, CEO at AWS, 28 November 2021, to Silicon Angle
“We’re building ever more powerful capabilities, pushing the edge of the cloud to new places with things like 5G and IoT. We’re driving towards seamless integration of data, analytics and machine learning that will be transformative. We’re tailoring services and applications to specific customer use cases and industries. The possibilities there are endless.” – Adam Selipsky, CEO at AWS, at AWS re:Invent 2021
AWS IoT in action
To understand how all of the different AWS IoT components come together, consider the following reference architecture for smart products.
The reference architecture shows how AWS IoT Core authenticates messages from smart products and routes those messages to the solution’s microservices (AWS Lambda functions). AWS IoT Device Defender audits devices to
ensure they do not deviate from security best practices. Finally, AWS IoT Analytics is used to analyze data from smart products. Non-IoT-specific AWS services, including Amplify, Amazon S3, and Amazon CloudFront, are also used.
iRobot is a known AWS IoT customer reference in this area. The global consumer robot company offers connected vacuum and mopping robots.
AWS’ IoT-specific services
AWS lists 13 specific IoT cloud services in its portfolio.
- Application management/enablement: AWS IoT FleetWise, AWS IoT TwinMaker
- Device management: AWS IoT Device Management, AWS IoT Events, AWS IoT Device Defender, AWS IoT 1-Click
- Data management/enablement: AWS IoT Core, AWS IoT Greengrass, AWS IoT SiteWise, AWS IoT Analytics, AWS IoT ExpressLink, AWS IoT RoboRunner
- Other IoT offerings: FreeRTOS
3. GCP IoT
Although Google Cloud is a distant third in the global public cloud computing market, the company is behind some of the latest and most-adopted cloud technologies. The open-source container orchestration platform Kubernetes, for example, was designed by Google and has since become the de facto standard for managing containers in the cloud. Due to its heritage in organizing search and related data, Google has also maintained a strength in analytics, Big Data, and, more recently, AI and machine learning. According to our research, Cloud IoT Core is the most popular Google Cloud IoT service (based on public IoT case studies). Cloud IoT Core is a fully managed service that is used to connect IoT devices. It can be combined with other services offered by Google Cloud to build an end-to-end IoT solution. Google’s IoT Core is very similar to Microsoft’s IoT Hub. For further data processing and management, Google integrates into its general blockbuster analytics tools (e.g., BigQuery) but, in contrast to its competitors, does not provide IoT-specific data services (e.g., AWS IoT Analytics).
With over 100 cloud services in total and only one dedicated to IoT, Google clearly is not prioritizing IoT in the same way as its two biggest rivals. Google’s IoT focus is very specialized, which also limits the company to some extent.
Consider, for example, the emerging topic of digital twins, which plays a key role in many IoT scenarios. Azure has its Digital Twin service for creating models of physical environments. AWS recently released AWS IoT TwinMaker with a similar focus. Google, however, has no general digital twin service. (Note: Google recently
previewed Supply Chain Twin, a digital twin service for supply chain optimization.)
IoT seems to be missing as a strategic element for Google Cloud. Google Cloud CEO Thomas Kurian has not emphasized IoT as a priority in any of his appearances. Although Google has some prominent IoT customers, such as Philips, it seems as though Google is focused less on enterprises with an IoT element and more on companies such as Spotify, Snapchat, and Best Buy (all of which are well-known Google Cloud customers).
Google Cloud IoT in action
To understand how the Google Cloud Platform services work together consider the following (general) architecture for IoT.
The reference architecture shows how messages from devices are brokered as events into the Cloud Pub/Sub events stream manager through IoT Core, which acts as a gateway between devices and cloud services. The Cloud Pub/Sub message triggers a cloud function to run on it. Cloud Dataflow (a managed service) helps transform the incoming streams. It can be used to filter incoming data that are not needed in the final storage. Messages stay in Cloud Pub/Sub temporarily, and it stores the data for seven days. Dataflow shuttles the data to the storage and
analytics section (Cloud Bigtable, BigQuery, and AI Platform). Google also offers data visualization tools, such as Datalab and DataStudio.
GCP’s IoT-specific services
GCP lists IoT Core as its only IoT cloud service. It provides a list of other supportive capabilities that are not IoT-specific but add more functionalities.
